Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around 02:40 on March 1, 2016, the Defendant heard that police officers, such as F and H, who were on the roads of “C” store located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, did not pay taxi charges despite the Defendant’s arrival at the destination, and did not pay taxi charges, and received a report from the Defendant, and called that they would pay taxi charges and return to Korea from police officers, such as the police officers belonging to the Seoul Song-gu Police Station E-gu Police Station E-gu, Seoul, E-gu, G, police officers belonging to the same district, and police officers assigned to the same district; and “I died at the time of the Army at the time of the Army at the time of the Army at D.”
C. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. F. “: (a) intending to deviate from the place and attempt to escape from the place of f. F. F. F. F.
There is no need.
The phrase " was tightly pushed down by hand the F's body."
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of F and H crimes, which are police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (or a relative investigation into a victim H police officer);
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Reasons for sentencing selective sentence of imprisonment with prison labor;
1. Scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months and up to April 1, one year and one year; and
2. The Defendant: (a) committed an act interfering with the performance of official duties while paying taxi charges and soliciting a police officer to return home.
The defendant has been punished by a fine due to damage to public goods, and it has been sentenced to the suspension of execution and the punishment of a fine for violent crimes, 6 times.
The damaged police officers were punished for the defendant.
This is disadvantageous to the defendant.
except that the defendant is all at this Court.