beta
Text
[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.
However, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2019 Highest 2544"
1. Defendant A, at the end of January 2019, intended to commit a crime of scaming with a member of the telephone financial fraud (tentatively named “scaming”), which was known in the course of seeking scam via the Internet website, and conspired to take charge of receiving money from victims by misrepresenting himself/herself as if he/she had taken place with a financial institution to make a false statement as if he/she would cause a loan to an unspecified number of victims, and the Defendant was in charge of receiving a scam card from a person who was not his/her name and withdrawing the amount of scaming damage and then remitting the amount of money in accordance with the direction of the person who was unable to obtain the scam.
On January 28, 2019, the name weakist stated that he/she falsely assumes an employee of the E bank from the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 67 years of age) at an unsound place, and then falsely speaks that "to lend 16 million won to the E bank if he/she redeems the existing loan," and that he/she shall be transferred KRW 6 million from the victim to the G association account in the name of F (H) on January 29, 2019, and on January 30, 2019, he/she was transferred KRW 3 million to the I Association (J) account in the name of K Bank account (M) on January 31, 2019, and the Defendant received KRW 5 million from 200,000 won from 300,000 won from 200,0000 won to 200,0000 won from 200,000 won from 200,000,000 won from the victim's account (hereinafter referred to 20.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a name-free person, obtained the victims' property through four times.
2. Defendant B, around March 2019, intended to commit the instant crime by telephone financial fraud (tentatively named “phishing”) with its officers and employees, and provided communication through “C memers”, and the Defendant was named.