logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.09.28 2017고단2050
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in the D SP area in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after the accident).

On April 17, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.193% during blood transfusion, driven a motor vehicle with the above Spoke in the state of alcohol 0.193%, led to the Defendant’s two-lane road in front of the “F EF EM” in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

At the time, the width of the road was narrow due to the night and parking vehicles parked on the side of the road. In such a case, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely before, after and after the driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and parked on the side of Madge Road due to his negligence and proceeded with the back-side penter part of the Hpoar car driven by the victim G (WW 26 years old) with the front right side of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, and suffered injury to the victim, such as a satise and a tension and a tension that do not have any satise in two commons, which require a medical treatment for about two weeks. The Defendant destroyed a damaged motor vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 421,958, such as the exchange of satisfs, and escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle and taking necessary measures.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.193% in a section of about 1km from the front of “mmp Ra” 21-1 “mm Ra,” located in the same water zone to the front of “water-resistant roller Ra” located in the same water zone at the time of the day referred to in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The statement of the police with regard to G.

arrow