beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff was supplied with KRW 44,00 worth of KRW 195,30,000 from the Defendant, and the Defendant paid KRW 150,000,000 as down payment, and the remainder of KRW 150,30,000 on December 4, 2013 remains. The Defendant did not pay KRW 45,30,000 for the amount payable by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant filed an application for the payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) with the court against the Plaintiff for the payment of the price of the goods and the delayed payment thereof under the court No. 2014,30,000 for the aforementioned payment order (hereinafter “instant payment order”) on June 2, 2014. It is clear that there was no dispute between the parties or any dispute arising from the record.
2. From the time when the Plaintiff’s assertion was additionally supplied by the Defendant, mms (mar (mar knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne more than 3% of the total amount of 33% and the remainder did not far
On the other hand, from the time when the Plaintiff was supplied with heavy trends, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to take measures, but failed to properly implement such measures, and around January 28, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the veterinarian of the result of msal training, 90% training of new virus, and the result of re-inspection on February 13, 2014, it was subject to msal confirmations and the confirmations of new viruss.
In light of this point, at the time of the Defendant’s supply of the drilling to the Plaintiff, the Defendant was already infected by mars, etc.
As the defendant supplied the plaintiff with the above defect in intention or negligence, the plaintiff suffered damages of 86,303,00 won in the amount equivalent to the expenses for fostering the 14,089 water from the death of the plaintiff, and 639,040,100 won in the amount equivalent to the revenue amount not obtained according to the low noise rate. Thus, only the price of the chickens closed after the death of the plaintiff shall be calculated 65,100.