A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2017.

[2] The Defendant of the 2017 High Order 3042, the Defendant, around May 2015, at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in the vicinity of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building, provided that “it is insufficient to operate a singing room.”

Until the end of the year in which money is lent, it was called that even if you sell the house which is set up in the name of Dong, it shall be repaid.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay money to the victim as he stated.

Nevertheless, on June 2, 2015, the Defendant received 5 million won from the injured party to the new bank account (E) with the Defendant’s name on June 2, 2015, as the cost of singing room operation, and acquired 42,979,000 won in total on seven occasions from that time to April 19, 2016, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table.

around October 7, 2015, the Defendant borrowed KRW 20 million per month for three months from the date on which he/she borrowed KRW 20,000,000 from the Defendant’s Gsing room operated by Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F to the victim H.

If it is not well-fashed, the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I borrowed the loan even if it is not well-fashed, and the fact that the deposit for the lease of G singing room currently in operation is KRW 30 million, so the principal will be repaid by the method of receiving the deposit upon the completion of the lease contract.

“Falsely speaking to the effect that it is “.......”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant was not in a state of specific planning or preparation for the operation of the store, such as finding out or operating a marina shop.

G Singing had been thought that the above borrowed money was used as singing operation and cost of living, and there was no house owned by the Defendant in the J, in addition to it.