1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had liveded between the victim C (V, 33 years of age) and the victim from January 2004 to June 2005. During the above period of living, the victimized person had been living in the company, and the company funds voluntarily consumed under the pretext of some agreements, and came to be hedging with the victim after he voluntarily repaid the company funds under the pretext of some agreements.

On the other hand, the Defendant discovered that the victim had a matrimonial engagement with other men and operated a restaurant in the vicinity of the art room of the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City D, where the Defendant was unable to accept part of the agreement that the Defendant paid for the victim in the past.

1. On June 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) called “E” restaurant operated by the victim to the Busan Southern-gu, which was operated by the victim with the matrimonial partner in Busan-do; and (b) identified the mobile phone number from the victim; and (c) from around that time to August 1, 2014, the victim caused damage to the victim by telephone conversations and text messages with the victim, and was able to gather our house.

It does not refuse to do so.

Whether the male-friendly Gu ofp is living together with the width.

Whether male-family families are also male-family members.

B. There is no mind that there is no attempt to obstruct marriage.

If we do not give money as soon as possible, you will do so.

D. Does this issue with four days' day.

B. It will be done in a way within Do.

“If the victim does not comply with the request of the Defendant,” the victim’s Matrimonial engagement was committed as if the victim was living together with the Defendant, and was transferred from June 10, 2014 to August 1, 2014, in total, 12 million won from around 10 times to around 10 times from around 10 June 2014 to around 10, 2014 to the Defendant’s Matrimonial account.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

2. On December 9, 2014, around 11:00 on December 9, 2014, the Defendant who attempted to go to the Defendant “Iskn’s complaint against the Defendant’s “Isk’s complaint” with telephone communications and text messages from the Busan Japanese War.

It does not refuse to hear such a speech.

1.