The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (ten months of imprisonment, two hundred thousand won of additional collection) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. Determination of the Defendant is an element of sentencing favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant acknowledges, reflects, and refrains from repeating the instant crime, and that the Defendant actively cooperates in the investigation of E and J, etc., who committed a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (f

However, the Defendant had previously been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence), and the Defendant was sentenced by the Seoul Central District Court on May 2, 2013 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) and on January 6, 2014 at the Seoul Central District Court on January 6, 2014, the Defendant again committed the instant crime on January 24, 2014 where one month has not passed since the enforcement of the sentence was completed, and the Defendant again committed the instant crime on January 24, 2014 where one month has not passed, and there is no change of circumstances that may be special consideration in the trial, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records of the instant case, the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.