1. Defendant E’s KRW 5,950,00 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from September 2, 2014 to December 17, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 2014, the Plaintiff would make it possible for the Plaintiff to use a low interest rate loan by telephone from a person who assumes a false name who assumes the G representative of the Nonghyup Federation G to use it.

The term "Korea Asset Management Corporation" grants a high interest rate to the ordinary people at a low interest rate and requires various expenses, such as surety insurance and stamp tax, in order to obtain a loan.

"A telephone was received".

The Plaintiff’s order from September 1, 2014 to the same month in accordance with the direction of the above-mentioned person without a name.

2. The Defendants’ account was deposited in KRW 25,450,000 as follows.

The money transferred by the Plaintiff as follows was withdrawn by the recipient immediately after the transfer.

Defendant Account Transfer Amount B: (a) 25,450,000 won in total of F community credit cooperatives L 3,50,000 won in total of KRW 3,50,000 in Da community credit cooperatives of KRW 6,000,000 in Da community credit cooperatives of KRW 5,950,000 in Da community credit cooperatives of KRW 6,50,000 in 25,450,000.

B. Meanwhile, around August 2014 through September 9, 2014, Defendant B, C, D, and F heard the words of obtaining loans from agricultural cooperatives from those who were named in bad faith, and around October 12, 2010, opened the account of the above post offices or community credit cooperatives in accordance with the orders of those who were named in bad faith, and issued cash cards, passbooks, etc. to those who were named in bad faith.

[Ground of Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the court's offset 6-dong post offices, Suwon Saemaeul Community Depository, Yangbuk Community Depository, Seowon Saemaul Community Depository, and Seocho 3-dong post offices as a result of an order to submit financial transaction information, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (e.g., the Plaintiff’s assertion) aided and abetting the Plaintiff to readily commit the so-called singinging fraud by the unsing the passbook and cash card opened in his name to the unsing person, so that the unsing person could commit the so-called singing fraud against the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendants committed the act of aiding and abetting the Plaintiff as a tort of the unsing person’s