1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on April 22, 2013 under the nationality of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (hereinafter “Ethiopia”), and stayed in the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on April 22, 2013, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on May 15, 2013, prior to the expiration of the period of sojourn ( May 22, 2013).

B. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision not to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution as a refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was made from 2007 to 2009 by Ethiopia, who majored in rinking at Athiopia Libera Hospital, and worked as a water at Athodi hotel, and worked at Ethiopia’s internal food transport department, Ethiopia, the Ethiopia State Port Authority, from around 2009 to around 2009 when entering the Republic of Korea.

Oral ar is a maximum of 40% of the total population of Ethiopia, and there has been discrimination compared to Ethal arars that account for 6% of the total population of Ethiopia.

In addition, the long-term collection of EPRDF (EPPPR Democratic Cable), which is Ethiopia in Ethiopia, was mobilized by anti- democratic means, such as press control, camping pressure, and religious pressure. In particular, UDJ (E), which is a political party that mainly takes the equal order under the law, was convicted of committing terrorism against the government or was politically expressed.

On September 8, 2008, the plaintiff was admitted to the UDJ as a member of the UDJ.