The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below is too inappropriate.

2. It is recognized that the defendant's mistake is divided, and that the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, the number of times the defendant purchased or administered a phiphones is considerable, the balance of sentencing with the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as various conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.