1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

(a)each real estate listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 3 through 9;

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff is the owner of each building and land indicated in the attached Table 1 list (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing” and the above land, and both the above building and land are the owners of the instant real estate.

The Plaintiff owned 9.5 square meters and 6.1 square meters on the ground of the land originally listed in the table Nos. 1 attached hereto, and leased the above house and warehouse to the Defendant around March 1990.

However, after the defendant, the defendant is now.

The houses and warehouses in the port were arbitrarily removed, and were newly constructed and reconstructed into the “Smentmenbenb’s and mentary roof neighborhood living facilities” and “1 house unit and 28 square meters” (including the said reconstruction part).

Accordingly, on June 3, 1996, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on the instant house with the Defendant. “The Plaintiff shall lease the said house to the Defendant after obtaining permission from, and filing a report to, the government office on the pertinent house, etc., and entering it in the official book as owned by the Plaintiff, and the Defendant waives all rights, such as the right to construct and rebuild each building. The Defendant shall lease the said house without compensation for two years, and the Defendant shall deliver it to the Plaintiff upon the expiration of the above free lease period, and if not, the rent shall be paid until the delivery date.”

The Plaintiff and the Defendant notarized the deed signed by private persons in accordance with No. 2139 on the same day, including C Office, etc. on the same day.

Since then, the defendant resided in the house of this case until now, and planted trees, etc. on the ground of this case as shown in attached Form 2, and newly constructed a warehouse, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "ground of this case").

On April 25, 2008, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to remove the instant ground and deliver the instant real estate with the content certification, and on May 17, 2010.