Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Criminal facts

1. Around 17:05 on September 17, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (i.e., an accident) (i., a traffic accident) while driving a B B B B B B-V cruise car in accordance with two-lanes from the side of the vibration to the right-hand side of the road between the vibration and the west-do three-lanes. On the part of the victim C’s occupational negligence, which did not show the front and rear left-hand side while under the influence of alcohol, did not go through the same direction from the first lane of the said road, to the front side of the Defendant’s car, thereby damaging approximately KRW 1,800,000 of the repair cost to the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle and escape without taking necessary measures.

2. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.204% at the time and place under the above paragraph (1) of this Article, driven a Vietnam cruise car under the above paragraph (1) from a section of about 27 kilometers up to the road front of the new relic in the Changwon-si's window sales line, up to the point of 0.204%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident occurrence reports, reports on driving of jun drivers, reports on the actual state of jun drivers, reports on the statements on the status of jun drivers, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act and Articles 148, 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and Articles 148, 54 (2) 1, and 44 (1) of the same Act (the point of driving sound and the selection of fines);

1. From among concurrent crimes, the punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment heavier than that provided for in the provisions of the Road Traffic Act) shall be applied to concurrent crimes resulting from the concurrent crimes (the subordinate punishment shall be the concurrent crimes resulting from the violation of the Road Traffic Act;

A person shall be appointed.

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is 0.204% of blood alcohol concentration.