logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.05.16 2017고단4799 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B, from January 8, 2017 to February 8, 2017, with non-regular employees, “C” runs a commercial sex business establishment under the trade name of “E”; D is a person who runs a commercial sex business establishment under the name of “E” and operated a commercial sex business establishment in the location of the above location including the above location, such as leasing the Ftel G in the name of the Defendant and employing female employees; B and non-employee in the case of “C” on February 8, 2017, upon receiving a pre-contract for commercial sex business from customers, but the case of “C” requested that D lend the above officetel G and female employee in commercial sex business; D lent 150,000 won per hour to a female employee in commercial sex business establishment; and the employee in the case of B and non-party to entertainment provided guidance to the female employee in commercial sex business; and the employee in commercial sex business provided guidance to the female employee in commercial sex business, as the business of arranging the female employee in commercial sex.

The Defendant, in advance, lent the name of the lease of the above officetel G to D, who was in close friendship with the Defendant, and allowed D to use it under the name of the Defendant, and did not intend to use it.

After the above crackdown, the Defendant had the first offender committed a fraudulent act as if he was unemployed and was punished as a substitute for the act of arranging sexual traffic. On May 12, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the following purport: (a) on August 31, 2017, the Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Police Station H office, as the Defendant was the unemployment owner of the said sexual traffic business establishment; and (b) on August 31, 2017, the Defendant submitted a lease agreement for the said officetel used as the commercial sex business establishment under the name of the Defendant by the lessee as evidence for the said false statement.

In the end, the defendant had a person who committed a crime subject to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

Summary of Evidence

1.

arrow