logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.10.31 2016가단13092
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From November 2010, the Plaintiff operated the Ulsandong-gu Seoul’s “D Family” (hereinafter “D Family”) located in Ulsan-gu, U.S.C., and the Defendant is the Plaintiff’s University Establishment.

B. Around November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a criminal charge against the Defendant with the head of Ulsan-dong Police Station stating that “Around March 2012, the Plaintiff may resolve the marriage problem between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s female-friendly district through the father’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’

C. On July 20, 2017, the Daegu District Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor for the following criminal facts (hereinafter “relevant criminal judgment”), and the judgment of the first instance court became final and conclusive around that time.

“Defendant” (referred to as “Defendant” in this subsection)

) The victim (as referred to in this subsection as “Plaintiff”) means the victim.

There is sufficient family situation between the university and the university, but it is possible to help the victim, who is kept in the world, know of the fact that he operates the house, and approach to obtain money for various expenses.

Around May 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “D head office” operated by the victim, stating that “Around May 2012, the victim would be able to easily resolve difficulties, such as issues with four gold, marriage problems, and so on. It has been 867 in a remote number, and thus, 867,000 won per one time at a different cost.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the qualification certificate, and did not have the related experts, and there was no intention or ability to solve the problem about the victim's mind with the other points.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow