logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2017가합590219
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the respective entries and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 2 to 5, 17, and Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, and 13 (including each number):

1) Defendant D, G, J, and M (hereinafter “Defendant students”)

(2) At the time of 2017, the Plaintiff was a female student attending the third grade of Q middle school in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the Plaintiff was a female student attending the second grade of the same middle school. Defendant E and F are the parents of Defendant D, Defendant H and I are the parents of Defendant G, Defendant K and L are the parents of the parental authority of Defendant G, Defendant K and L are the parents of Defendant J, and Defendant N andO are the parents of the parental authority of Defendant M.

(hereinafter referred to as “the Defendant’s parents”). B.

(1) On July 18, 2017, Plaintiff A conspired with Nonparty S, a student attending the R high school first grade due to a graduate from Q middle school.

T, which is a female student attending the first year Q middle school, is considered to have a sense to her, but S knew that she has a female-friendly Gu, and he knew her that she had a female-friendly Gu, and U makes it known to her that she was a female-friendly U, and U is called 'low' in order to criticize, criticize, and criticize the object of this article on P, and to make public opinion on P. S in P.

A notice was posted and a number of comments that criticize S were published in this article.

Then, in order to protect S on July 17, 2017, Plaintiff A made an article to criticize students who posted the above article and those who criticize their comments.

Plaintiff

As to A's above writing, the first-year female-friendly female students V, students enrolled in Q middle school and graduates, and other school students included comments.

B) On July 18, 2017, V divided the Plaintiff A’s stories in the class of the second half class of the year 2017, and the number of students ambling to V and the Plaintiff’s surroundings, and observed the situation (hereinafter the same).

arrow