(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.22 2016노965 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.22 2016노965

무고등

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant was convicted of the Defendant, although he was not guilty, since knee and buckbucks were treated for injuries by shocking between the vehicle that he got behind, even though he did not go to E or deceiving the victim interesting country fire marine insurance company, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. A. A summary of the facts charged 1) On March 7, 2015, the Defendant discovered a F-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-c-f-c-f-h-h-h-h-

The Defendant reported a traffic accident through G with the aim of having a criminal punishment imposed upon E, and stated to the police officer on the spot that “E was subject to punishment because he/she was kneeing while driving the said vehicle,” and continued to make a statement for the same purpose even after being investigated at the Busan East Police Station’s guard and the Busan East Police Station’s office for traffic accident investigation.

2) The fraud Defendant was driven by E as described in paragraph 1.

F There was no difference between a car and a car. From March 11, 2015, there was no difference between a car and a car.

3. By up to 14. A traffic accident is caused by the victim interesting fire, marine insurance company, which is the insurer of the comprehensive insurance on the above vehicle, and is the victim, who was the insurer of the comprehensive insurance as to the above vehicle, and was hospitalized in the hospital located in Busan Nam-gu HI by pretending that the vehicle was injured.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고단3997

-부산지방법원 2018.04.03 2017가단15276

-전주지방법원 2018.04.30 2018고단379

-수원지방법원 2017.09.06 2017고정1656

-울산지방법원 2016.02.18 2014고단3947