1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu 181m2, each point is indicated in the attached Form No. 5, 12, 8, 7, 6, and 5.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 21, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased from D, Jung-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “instant land”); and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land on October 24, 2014.

B. On April 30, 1979, E completed the registration of preservation of ownership as to a building constructed on the ground of the Daejeon Central and Middle-gu F site adjacent to the instant land (hereinafter “Adjoining land”). On November 27, 1999, E completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the neighboring building on the building (10: 10-38 but, 10-38, mentmen’s house for mentmen’s stone and brick colon’s colon’s colon’s house for mentment, mentmen’s bricks, and mentmen’s colon’s colon’s building building for ment and strings.

C. Over the boundary of neighboring land in the construction process of a neighboring building, neighboring buildings were constructed on the ground of (b) part 11 square meters (hereinafter “part 1 of (b) on the instant land”) connected in order to each point of (b) of the annexed drawings among the instant land, which is located within the scope of the boundary of neighboring land.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, each of the evidence Nos. 2, the result of this court's commission of appraisal to the Daejeon Vice-Governor of the Daejeon National Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff is the owner of the instant land, and the Plaintiff may seek the exclusion of disturbance by occupying the said land by owning an adjacent building on the ground of the land in (b) part of the said land. The Defendant has a duty to remove the adjacent building on the ground in (b) part of the land and deliver the said land to the Plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.

3. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. Since the Defendant designates a compartmentalization and rearrangement project district as a land annexed to the instant land is designated as a rearrangement and rearrangement project district as all of the land annexed to the instant land, he/she shall be entitled to the removal, delivery, etc. against the other owners until the procedures, such as a replotting disposition, etc., of the project implementer, are