logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고합215
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(알선영업행위등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Force” On May 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of 300,000 won for one year in imprisonment with prison labor for habitual night buildings, larceny, etc. at the Ulsan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2015.

【Criminal facts】 2015 Gohap 215】

1. Defendant and C shared the roles of the management of the price of sexual traffic and the overall management of the sexual traffic process, D shared the management of sexual traffic women and the invitation to buy sex, and D may get access to female juveniles who do not have any good place and impose money.

5 million won may be punished in one month.

After inducing “Slsannam-gu Eel, Ulsan-gu Eel, and through mobile phone-type cambling “F” or “G”, there were only 130,000 female juveniles once in return for sexual traffic from male and female buyers recruited through “G”, and arrange the said female juveniles to engage in sexual traffic, and as such, there was a solicitation to accept sexual traffic payments paid by female juveniles from male and female youths.

A. The Defendant, in collusion with D and C on May 21, 2014, up to July 2014, posted a letter to the “H” guest room located in Ulsan-gu E located in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, or online hosting site to arrange commercial sex acts. On the other hand, the Defendant, in collusion with D and C, posted a letter to arrange commercial sex acts. On the other hand, the Defendant, who read and contacted the above letter, led the victim to purchase the victim’s sexual intercourse with the victim’s sexual intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her other sexual intercourse with his/her child and youth, and had the victim’s sexual intercourse with his/her name during the average period of July 37, 2014, in addition to allowing the victim’s sexual intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her other sex intercourse with his/her sexual intercourse with his/her other sex intercourse with his/her name.

Accordingly, the defendant is a child or juvenile in collusion with D or C as above.

arrow