Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A Co., Ltd. is a corporation whose objective is the export and import business of leather products, etc., and the defendant A is the representative of the above corporation.
No trader or distributor of goods, etc. shall commit any act of impairing or changing the indication of origin.
1. On January 2019, Defendant A: (a) at the B logistics warehouse located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Defendant removed the labels indicated in “MAEIN CHA”, “place of origin”, and attached labels indicated in “Korea”, which are the origin labeling attached to the 698 punishment, imported (import declaration number D) from China on January 25, 2019; and (b) at the same time until October 21, 2019, the Defendant damaged and modified the indication of origin on the total of 15,736 clothes (the total goods are KRW 2,214,905,503) as indicated in the attached list of crimes.
2. Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant, damaged and modified the indication of origin as above in relation to the Defendant’s business at the above date and place.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Results of damage to B mark of origin;
1. Ascertainment of inventory status of goods inspected to indicate origin;
1. Photographs, such as labels;
1. A photograph before and after maintenance work;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a list of sales and inventory quantity books;
1. Article applicable to criminal facts;
(a) Defendant A: Subparagraph 1-2 of Article 53-2 and Article 33 (4) 2 of the Foreign Trade Act;
(b) Defendant B: Articles 57, 53-2, 1-2, and 33 (4) 2 of the Foreign Trade Act;
1. Selection of punishment (the defendant A) imprisonment;
1. Of concurrent crimes (defendants), the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);
1. 가납명령 (피고인 주식회사 B) 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 ◎ 불리한 정상 ; 피고인 A의 행위는 “국산 의류”라는 점에 대한 소비자들의 통상적인 신뢰를 훼손한 것으로 그 죄질이 상당히 좋지 않은...