All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (with regard to the acquittal portion), the Defendants, even though they did not select the N as the executory agent, did not use the money received from the victim for the purpose of informing the victim of the fact that they had been selected.

2. As to the facts charged in the instant case, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of crime on the grounds of multiple reasons in the judgment of innocence.

A thorough examination of the judgment of the court below in comparison with the evidence records, and in addition, Defendant A stated that Qu lends 5.5 billion won to R the cooperative deposit and grants N the right to recommend civil engineering works and landscaping companies to N to enter into an implementation agency contract with N. The fact that R still assumes that N has not yet been selected as an implementation agent, and R is legally entitled to legal status only when the general meeting is opened and resolved. Before that, it stated that R’s speech is prepared. Before that, after hearing the horses of Defendant A and reading the above written confirmation, it was stated at the investigative agency and court that N was solicited to lend money to S, and that it was also stated by the investigation agency and court that P was also aware that the above Defendants lent money to the aforementioned investigative agency and made it possible for the aforementioned Defendants to directly use the written confirmation from the victim, and that R was even aware of the fact that the Defendants were directly in charge of the aforementioned written confirmation.