The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized articles 1 through 8, 10 through 12, 17, 19, 19.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and three years of suspended execution) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant, such as the confession and reflection of all of the instant crimes, the amount of damage by each victim appears to be a small amount, and the Defendant deposited certain money for all of the victims.

However, the crime of this case is committed in a short period of up to 17 months and repeatedly steals goods after destroying and damaging them by using a tool for the crime that the defendant prepared in advance the correction entrance, etc. of the victim's way operated by the victims, etc. (i.e., a single-name "explos") through a short period of 17 times, and thus, the nature of such crime is not very good. The defendant has the record of having the same criminal power and having been sentenced to punishment for a part of the same crime, and the fact that no agreement has been reached with the victims at all are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In this context, the scope of the recommended sentence by the Sentencing Committee is deemed to be unfair in light of the following: (a) the scope of the recommended sentence by the Sentencing Committee is three to six years in prison; (b) the thief group; (c) the thief group; (d) the thief group; (d) the thief group; (e) the thief group; (e) the thief (vi) the person under special affiliation (where committing a crime repeatedly using tools and implements); (e) the increased area; and (g) the scope of the recommended sentence.

3. The judgment below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is with merit, and the following judgment is rendered again after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the evidence admitted by this court is as follows. The summary of the judgment of the court below is as follows: (a) the first phrase “ February 25, 2006” as “ February 15, 2006”; and (b) [Attachment 5 through 9, 11, 12, 14, and 16” as “paragraph (2)” as “paragraph (4).”