Text
1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (i) The land of Incheon Strengthening Group E was originally owned by the FF and five others. On July 3, 1973, the said land was divided into E, G, and H three parcels, and the category of the G land was changed to the road. As a result, the land listed in attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “1”) was created.
The land I of the Luxembourg Incheon reinforced Group was originally owned by J, and on July 3, 1973, it divided the above land into three parcels I, K, and L, and the category of the K land was changed to a road. As a result, the land listed in paragraph 2 of the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as "second land") was created.
【Road Construction Works” was conducted according to the Saemaul Movement Project, which was enforced in the Japan, but the land Nos. 1 and 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”) was used for the passage of local residents since it was offered as the road around 1973.
B. (i) Land No. 1 was owned by F on July 8, 1975, and the Plaintiff purchased it on November 2, 1989 and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its future on March 28, 2008, remains as owned by the Plaintiff until now.
Shebland 2 remains as owned by the plaintiff since the plaintiff purchased it from J on December 26, 1974 and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its future on December 31, 1974.
C. (i) Defendant B’s status as the Defendants, etc. is the land owner of Incheon reinforced Group M, Defendant C’s land, and Defendant D’s land owner.
The above lands owned by the Defendants are located near each of the instant lands.
The status of each of the instant lands and the Defendants’ land is as follows.
Defendant B: (a) the fact that there is no dispute over the land NH LHG M (based on recognition); (b) the entry in the evidence No. 1-2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and the evidence No. 1-1-2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and the purport of the whole pleadings; and (c) the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The Plaintiff’s assertion Defendants are owned by the Plaintiff from around 2000 to set up their own land.