The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant was admitted to the accounts operated by the victim while withdrawing from the accounts, and did not borrow money from the victim, such as the statement in the loan certificate, but the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged otherwise, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In the judgment below, the defendant made the same assertion as the reasons for appeal, and the court below rejected the above argument and sentenced the defendant guilty on the grounds as stated in the judgment of the court below in the judgment of the court below on the defendant's and defense counsel's argument. The court below stated the following circumstances: (i) the details of settlement of accounts for anti-definites on or around October 31, 2008 prepared by the defendant; (ii) the details of settlement of accounts for the counter-definites are not stated; and (iii) if the victim formally prepared a loan certificate to the victim on the grounds that it is necessary to explain to other members as the defendant's argument, contrary to the actual contents of the defendant's set, the defendant's set forth "one million U.N. borrowed from the victim", and (iii) the defendant's name, date of birth, contact information, etc. were entered in the loan certificate and did not know the defendant's personal information about the victim's whereabouts; and (iv) the defendant did not know the victim's identity in the investigation agency.