The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) the fact that the defendant recognized all of his/her own crimes; (b) the fact that the crime was committed in an attempted crime; and (c) the fact that the defendant was punished in the Republic of

However, the so-called "Sishing" crime, such as the crime of this case, was committed in an organized, planned, and intelligent manner against many unspecified victims, and the social and economic harm therefrom is also serious, and there is a need to severely punish subordinate participants in the crime of this case, and the defendant seems to have actively participated in the crime of this case, such as misrepresentation of the Korea Asset Management Corporation staff, etc. In full view of all the factors indicated in the records of this case including the defendant's age, sex, family environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is difficult to see that the sentencing of the court below is unfair because it is excessively excessive, and therefore, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.