1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it is also acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

▣ 추가로 판단하는 부분 피고는, 원고가 이 사건 조정조서에서 향후 민사소송 등을 제기하지 않기로 하였음에도 다시 이 사건 소를 제기한 것이 부당하다는 취지로 주장한다.

According to Gap evidence No. 1, Paragraph 4 of the instant conciliation protocol, although it is acknowledged that both parties will not be held civil or criminal responsibilities for any of the following matters, the instant conciliation protocol cannot be deemed as contrary to the above conciliation clause, since it is an action under the enforcement law seeking to grant execution clause to enforce compulsory execution, not denying the validity of the instant conciliation protocol.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be justified and the defendant's appeal shall be dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.