1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On June 20, 2007, the Plaintiff was working with the machinery installation machinery installed in the Ilsan-gun Co., Ltd. around 11:00 on July 25, 2007, and was traveling business at the Busan District Co., Ltd. located in Ulsan-gun, Busan-gun, Busan-gun on July 25, 2007. On the second floor of the factory, the Plaintiff was going to travel at the Busan District Co., Ltd., Ltd., a factory and was flying up on the two-story electric control tower at a height of about 2 meters from the second floor of the factory, while he was working at a AV, and the Plaintiff was not discovered while entering another electric control tower on the two-lanes, and the Plaintiff fell at the electric control tower on the two-story floor above the electrical control tower, and the Plaintiff fell at the electric control tower with the two-storys, and caused the accident to the electric control tower (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. In the instant accident, the Plaintiff completed the treatment on October 7, 201, while receiving the diagnosis of the “porizontal escape certificate of a conical signboard between No. 5-6, the sacrifine damage, the sacrine damage, the sacrine damage, the sacrine and the left, the sacrine and the sacrine, the inner left, and the sacrine from the 3-4 column, the sacrine damage, the sacrine damage between the right side, and the sacrife for the Defendant to compensate for disability.

C. On October 20, 2011, the Defendant rendered a decision under Article 53(1)15 of the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act on the ground that the Plaintiff’s state of disability constitutes “persons whose labor remains limited to a considerable degree of harm to the function or mental function of the neurosis,” and that the Defendant constitutes “persons whose labor remains limited to a considerable degree.”

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence No. 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the lawfulness of the instant disposition

A. Even after the Plaintiff’s argument is closed, the Plaintiff’s symptoms due to the aftermathy are serious enough to be prescribed in the meconium, which is an ingredient of narcotics, and the Plaintiff’s subsequent legacy is deemed to be serious.