beta
Text
1. The defendants shall jointly and severally:
The amount of KRW 122,500,000 and the amount of KRW 245,000 shall be paid to Plaintiff A from October 1, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company established for the purpose of housing construction business, real estate leasing business, and sale business. Defendant C is the representative director of Defendant C, and Defendant D is the actual operator of Defendant C, F, G, H, and I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “each “stock company”).
B. From Sep. 2009 to Nov. 8, 2009, the Plaintiffs paid G the sales price to G with the object of G as the object of the Namyang-gu K apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) which obtained business approval on Oct. 8, 2008 between G from Sept. 2009 to Oct. 1, 2009. G entered into a sales contract with the Plaintiffs to sell the instant apartment units to G, and F entered into the sales contract with the Plaintiffs to sell the instant apartment units to the company. The said sales contract was entered into in the form of the investment contract, but the actual contents were entered into in the apartment sales contract with the form of the investment contract, but the said contract was set as the sale contract for the apartment unit, and
A guarantee was made.
(C) On October 13, 2009, November 13, 2009, 2000 B B, 100,000 on October 23, 2009, each of the sales contracts in the instant case (hereinafter referred to as “each of the sales contracts in this case”).
The Plaintiffs deposited each of the above sales prices into the accounts designated by G in the name of F as prescribed in the instant sales contract, but the instant apartment was not commenced due to the discontinuance of business around February 2010 after the F, a contractor applied for the workshop around February 2010.
Accordingly, as the plaintiffs set forth in G and F, F's employees L, including the plaintiffs, proposed that the 18 persons who concluded a sales contract with the same content as the plaintiffs (hereinafter "18 persons including the plaintiffs, etc.") be entitled to sell the commercial buildings in the urban development project zone of Osan City, O, another company operated by the defendant D, would be entitled to sell the commercial buildings in this case instead of the apartment buildings of this case, and 18 persons including the plaintiffs, etc. are I around August 27, 2010.