logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.07.17 2014구단53905
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 23, 1979, the Plaintiff entered the Army, and was discharged from military service on November 5, 1981 with the maturity of the hospital.

B. On November 6, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation by asserting that “Around July 8, 1981, during a regular M60 shooting training, the Plaintiff was shootinged due to the Plaintiff’s failure to meet water and respiratory and was faced with the Plaintiff’s right back to the Plaintiff’s right back side, which is a floating water, and that the Plaintiff was forced from the senior lower court to take the head of the 16 individual fire engine’s openings over several occasions (hereinafter “the instant accident”), and accordingly, the Plaintiff was killed with her ice and ice (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

C. On April 8, 2014, the Defendant suffered injuries from the Plaintiff’s performance of duties or education and training directly related to national defense, etc.

In accordance with the deliberation and resolution of the Merit Reward Judgment Committee, the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans rendered a decision on non-conformity with the requirements of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and non-conformity with the requirements of persons eligible for veteran's compensation (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case") to the effect that the injury or injury is not recognized as

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the accident in this case occurred during shooting training in preparation for a large M60 shooting measurement by the organizer of the association, accompanied by a burier, stove, stoves, and stoves, and stoves. After discharge, the plaintiff was suffering from the same pain until now, Article 2 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter "Act on Persons, etc.") Article 4 (1) 6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State and the Act on the Support for Persons, etc. Eligible for Veteran

arrow