logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.04 2018고정74
과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a dog that raises 2 math of “Alley,” “Alley Liber,” respectively.

On October 26, 2017, around 12:50, the Defendant parked a vehicle on the front road of the Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, and unloaded the said vehicle from the vehicle. The Defendant has a duty of care to take care of cutting the dog in order to avoid doing any act, such as dumping, sumping, etc., when accompanied by a place where there are many people or a place where people walk, and to thoroughly manage it so as not to cause any safety accident.

Nevertheless, the defendant was negligent in neglecting the above duty of care, and the defendant did not put the neck to the upper right hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand, etc. of the victim C(C) (C) where one of the above Maria was a part of the above Mari among the above Maria, thereby resulting in the defendant's loss of the 4 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation and internal investigation (related to the verification of the person suspected of being subject to investigation) to the attachment of the relevant photograph of the case, and to report internal investigation (related to the response to the commission of appraisal);

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 266 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment Order is not less complicated than that of the Defendant’s breach of the duty of care, but not agreed with the victim.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the degree of injury inflicted on the victim, the background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the accused, and the sexual conduct.

arrow