1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was tried to cut 130,000 c land in the Chungcheong-gun C (hereinafter “instant land”) from early March 2017 by cutting 130,000 crosa seedlings. However, the Plaintiff did not submit any evidence showing that the Defendant’s opening in the instant case raised between April 26, 2017 and around 9:0 a.m. to 10:0 p.m. on April 26, 2017.

However, while the Plaintiff and the witness D alleged that the Defendant’s dogs were relatively similar to the opening of the pictures of Gap evidence 7, the Defendant submitted the evidence No. 9-2 (the result of search “Stts”) by asserting that the Defendant’s dogs were species “Stts”. According to this, “Stts” is a small dog with the longer tension of the large white, and the body weight of 40-48 cm and 9k ggg.

The Mali-Ba had all damaged the seeds and seedlings of the 201 206 Mono.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total of KRW 7,000,000 and the total of KRW 20,000,000 and the total of KRW 27,00,000 and damages for delay.

2. We examined the judgment, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff and the testimony of the witness D of the trial party by the witness of the trial party alone damaged the defendant's dog nursery by breaking the land in this case and breaking down the so-called 's land'.

It is not sufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff incurred damages of KRW 27,00,000 in total of KRW 20,000 and KRW 20,000 in total of KRW 7,00,000, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

오히려 갑 제2호증, 을 제2호증의 각 영상(각 가지번호 포함)을 보면 이 사건 토지의 땅이 파인 부분은 깊게 움푹움푹 파인 모습이고 파인 자리가 둥글며 가장자리가 도려낸 듯이 선명함을 알 수 있어 개의 앞발로 긁거나 파헤친 모습이라고 보기 어렵다

If so, it is opened to the vinyl covering the land or the land.