logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.04.26 2017구합415
휴업급여일부부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 10, 2015, the Plaintiff was working for the FVC pipe for the construction of reputation with the steel-frame-processing hole, while working for a multi-purpose construction company. On or around June 10, 2015, the Plaintiff suffered the “high exchange” by getting off the fVC pipe for the purchase of cVC pipes in the upper part of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the Jinnam Sea at the construction site of Jinnam-gu, the construction site for the multi-purpose river, which was located in the upper part of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The Plaintiff received medical care from June 10, 2015 to October 30, 2016, and received temporary layoff benefits from the Defendant as listed below.

An amount paid as of June 11, 2015 to September 30, 2015, the total period of 10,301,760 paid as of September 4, 2015 to October 4, 2015, the total period of 10,301,760 paid from October 4, 2015 to October 31, 2015, the total period of 10,61,61,380 paid on June 2, 20, 200 to 36.6, 16.6, 20,6.6, 16.6, 30, 16.6, 20, 16.6, 30, 16.6, 20,06, 16.6,0,000,000 won to 20,000,000 won to 20,000 won;

C. The Plaintiff applied for an additional injury in accordance with the foregoing accident, “Sari-gun, the left-hand fat salt on the left-hand side, and the left-hand fat salt,” but the Defendant did not approve it.

B. The defendant

On February 15, 2016, the Plaintiff rendered a decision on the collection of unjust enrichment of KRW 5,334,840 out of the amount paid to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff filed a request for examination against the Defendant regarding the foregoing disposition, but the Defendant dismissed the request for examination.

However, on June 30, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, and the said Committee rendered a ruling revoking the decision on collection of unjust enrichment on February 15, 2016.

arrow