1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim, even if all evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are examined, does not differ from the contents of the Plaintiff’s claim in the court of first instance. Thus, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable. Accordingly, the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.