The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On June 21, 2015, around 23:20 on June 21, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, such as plicking, plucking, and plucking the Defendant’s right shoulder, which the Defendant attempted to arrest the Defendant’s first-hand F of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station D Police Station, as a current offender of interference with general traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (one day conversion: one hundred thousand won);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence are as follows: (a) comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and all the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the argument of the instant case

A. The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and is in depth against the Defendant.

B. The Defendant is a primary offender.

(c)

Police Officers E appeal to the Defendant’s wife.

(d)

E As a witness land category, the E attempted to arrest F as a current offender of a crime of interference with general traffic, and the Defendant is deemed to have committed the instant crime in the course of informing that the land category was erroneous and there are circumstances to consider in the process of committing the instant crime.