The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except where the defendant added the judgment under Paragraph 2 below to the argument that the court newly adopted or emphasized in this court, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement of evidence Nos. 4 through 8 and 15, it is recognized that the Defendant, from the end of 2016, had been in a pro-friendly relationship with C and C, with the knowledge that he/she was a spouse, and had committed an unlawful act, such as having sexual intercourse, at the Moel.

The defendant asserts that the defendant merely sent C and the workplace rent and did not have committed any unlawful act such as sexual intercourse, etc., and that C is a third party, not the defendant, and each letter of May 1, 2019 (Evidence A7) prepared by C by assault and intimidation of the plaintiff.

However, in light of the fact that C, around December 28, 2017, was referred to as “hergrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrg

Furthermore, around April 29, 2019, C had caused the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s mother, and his female members to commit an unlawful act with the Defendant. On May 1, 2019, C prepared a letter recognizing a fraudulent act with the Defendant. Around that time, C was subject to assault and intimidation from the Plaintiff in light of the Kakao Stockholm message sent and received between the Plaintiff and C.