logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.08.30 2016고단1156
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 28, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Changwon District Court to a fine of KRW 2 million due to a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving), a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving), and a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the same court Msan support on October 31, 201 to a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving).

[2] On April 2, 2016, at around 03:55, the Defendant driven a B Spact land under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.062% of alcohol in a section of about 50 meters from a 50-meter radius to the front day of the spular road located in the sponsed spons of the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of the driver at home, report on the situation of the driver at home, and inquiry into the circumstances of the driver at home;

1. Photographs taken of the measurement result of drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (the previous convictions);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is that the Defendant committed a second offense without being aware of the past record of being punished three times due to drinking driving.

In addition, the Defendant intentionally avoided the trial by being aware of the fact that the trial of this case is continuing, not refusing to summon and not notifying his whereabouts.

However, at the time of driving of the instant case, the distance of driving without much weight is also driving.

The accident did not lead to the actual accident.

The preceding previous conviction was a fine for a long time, and the last five years.

arrow