The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The lower court, under favorable circumstances in which the Defendant led to confession and reflect on the instant crime, took into account the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the same repeated crime period, and determined the sentence (a year of imprisonment, additional collection) by taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and taking into account various sentencing conditions set forth in the instant records and arguments (a year of imprisonment, and additional collection).

The Defendant asserts that he made confessions and reflects on the grounds of unfair sentencing, that there was a fact that the Defendant prevented other prisoners who attempted suicide during confinement in the Jinju Prison, and that he cooperates in the investigation by informing of the superior party. However, the above circumstances are already circumstances that the lower court already considered in determining the sentence against the Defendant or changes in the sentencing conditions.

In light of the above conditions of sentencing, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable because it is too large within the reasonable scope of discretion, in light of the circumstances that are difficult to see, including the criminal records and the background of the crime.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.