logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2012.11.15 2011고정336
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 07:50 on June 8, 201, at the dry field owned by the victim E (73 years of age) in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, the victim abused the Defendants, such as sprinking agrochemicals on the face of the Defendant B, and caused the victim's face more than once and more than 15 days so that the victim's face needs to be treated for about 15 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the details of fighting match occurrence and the degree of damage mutually);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel alleged that there was no assault against the victim in regard to the defendant's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the victim consistently made a statement about the assault of the defendant A, and considering the fact that the defendant was taking the victim's standing on the ground floor at the time of dispatch by the police officer, and that the elderly victim did not unilaterally exercised violence against the majority of the defendants, it is acknowledged that the defendant and the victim committed an injury identical to the facts of the crime committed by the victim in the course of wrapping the victim.

The above assertion is not accepted.

Parts of innocence

1. Defendant A and B, around 07:50 on June 8, 201, expressed the victim’s face at the dry field owned by the victim E (73 years of age) in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and expressed the victim’s desire to “I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see? I would like to see why I would like to see? I would like to see why I would like to see? I would like to see why I would like to see? I would like to see? I would like to see why I would like to see? I would like to see why I would like to see the victim’s face at one time, and Defendant B would like to walk the victim’s am while I would like to walk the victim’s am from the victim’s am on one occasion,

arrow