The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. It is true that the defendant committed an act identical to the facts charged, but this does not constitute obstruction of the performance of official duties as it occurred in the process of excessive suppression of the prison officer's unfair treatment without paying a minimum range of circulation, and against the correctional officer's unlawful performance of official duties who committed the protective gear.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On July 24, 2018, the Defendant alleged misunderstanding of the facts charged of this case 1: (a) around 19:40, 2018, when he paid a fright to fright at the Seoul Southern Detention House B room located in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, 865, he paid a fright to fright, “at home” and “at home,” and “at home,” the worker uses a clean frighting, and frighting,” and even if he paid one additional fright to fright, he expressed his desire to frighten, “at home, if fright, if fright, if fright, if frighten, if frighten, if frighten, if frighten, if frighten, if frighten, and if frighten, if frighten, if frighter’s fright to fright, etc., and caused the fright to fright.”

As a result, the defendant performs his duties on the maintenance of order in the detention house.