logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.12 2018고정101
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

From February 2016 to April 20, 2016, as the representative of D, D, which is a subcontractor, performed an aggregate construction work at the owner E’s officetel from February 2016 to April 20, 2016, and the facts charged in the victim F (representative director G) Co., Ltd. are stated as the victim, but it is obvious that G was indicted as the victim, and thus, it is corrected accordingly.

The owner provided construction materials, such as water pumps, from July 20, 2015 to November 30, 2015, before E enters into a contract for construction works with C, and the owner provided the construction materials.

The Defendant suspended construction due to the payment of the construction cost during the construction process until the above date, and dismantled various construction materials, such as basin pumps, etc. entered from the order of February 2, 2017 to March 1, 2017, and removed them from the construction site.

On February 27, 2017, the defendant found that the damaged person was mixed with the oil pumps, etc. leased on or around February 16, 2017 while dismantling and completing construction materials, etc., he/she received the report of H from the site warden in receipt of the owner E, and had him/her return 135 of the 6012 oil pumps to the victim.

G and owner E received the return of 135 of the 6012 pump on the front side of the building, and received a written confirmation that the damaged party will later return it by using the leased loak, and then signed and sealed by C’s I (I) and D’s I (H) at the site site.

The Defendant, from February 28, 2017 to March 13:30, 2017, at the construction site of an officetel of the building owner E, located in the C, the wife populationJ, as above, was accumulated on the side of the building owned by the victim as above, at the construction site of the building E, the market price of which was KRW 9 million (6012, such as the erop, other than the erop of 6012) and 240,000 (hereinafter referred to as the “erop of this case”).

arrow