1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. In the first instance court’s trial scope, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendants against the Plaintiff, and Defendant B filed a counterclaim claiming damages against the Plaintiff, and all of the claims for the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim were dismissed. It is evident that only the Plaintiff filed an appeal against this.

Therefore, it is judged that only the claim is subject to the judgment of this court.

2. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, and H were elected as representatives for each Dong 19 J apartment, and were working as members of the said apartment council from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014, and Defendant I served as the head of the said apartment management office.

B. In October 2014, which was held on October 10, 2014, the council of occupants' representatives, at the council of occupants' representatives at the council of occupants' representatives, the council of occupants' representatives decided to re-enter the existing housing management business entity into a housing management entity with the consent of six members, among eight members. On October 13, 2014, the council of occupants' representatives posted a public notice of the results of the above re-contract on October 14, 201, and on October 24, 2014, the resident who is dissatisfied with the above re-contract posted a public notice of objection stating that he/she shall submit a written objection to the management office by October 24,

C. Around October 15, 2014, the Plaintiff, who had an opposing opinion, posted the instant apartment site without the consent of the management office (Evidence A5) under the title “the reference content related to the public notice of objection against the housing management operator agreement” that the wooden Engineering Co., Ltd. selected as a housing management company as of the present housing management company obtained approximately KRW 450 million,000,000,000, and the Plaintiff was removed on the ground that the said apartment site was not permitted under the said apartment management agreement.

J apartment council of occupants' representatives opened a temporary council of occupants' representatives on October 17, 2014 and solicits as above.