logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.01.26 2015고단1202
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving a PP car volume.

On March 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle for business purposes around 08:15, while driving the vehicle, which led to the flow distance from the Hadong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure that he/she well sees the traffic situation on the front side, while safely proceeding in the traffic signals and prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, even though the vehicle stop signal was turned down due to the continuous negligence, it was shocked that the front part of the victim C(33) driving of the victim C(33) driving, which entered the intersection from the lower-Dong-dong west by the signal to the left-hand turn turn, was shocked into the front part of the vehicle's front string and fences.

Accordingly, the defendant's occupational negligence caused injury to the victim, such as the salt pansium, the lower lusium, the lusium, the lusium, and the tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A traffic accident report and a traffic accident report (on-site investigation report);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes governing field photographs and audio-visual CDs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the degree of violation of the defendant's duty of care for occupational reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is somewhat minor, the victim's injury is relatively minor, the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by automobile insurance, and the victim does not wish to punish the defendant by agreement with the victim.

arrow