logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고정86
강제추행
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On August 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) followed the victim C (nive, 21 years of age) on the street near the bus stops in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul; (b) pushed the Defendant’s body after the victim, etc.; and (c) committed an indecent act by force against the victim on his/her her hand, with his/her her her her her turbane.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, it is insufficient to acknowledge only the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it otherwise, as to whether the Defendant intentionally followed the victim's body in the street near the bus stop and pushed the victim's body, etc. after the victim's body was pushed down, and the victim's her her her her her her her her b

① The Defendant made a statement at an investigative agency to the effect that “The Defendant was faced with the victim by chance, and intentionally did not have the victim.”

(2) At the time, the defendant was walking on the street near the bus stop.

At the same time, the victim seems to have been able to see the Handphones in front of the defendant.

The defendant go back to the left side of the victim.

It seems that the left part of the defendant's kick and the victim's left part are faced.

However, as stated in the facts charged, whether the defendant intentionally followed the victim's body by intentionally following the victim, etc., and whether the defendant was her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

③ Each statement of the victim’s investigative agency and court seems to conform to the facts charged, but it is merely a statement made on the basis of the perception that the victim was contacted. Furthermore, with respect to the perception and part of the contact, the victim made a different statement between investigative agency and this court, and the victim made a different statement.

arrow