logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.05.24 2012고단591
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a false accusation in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2012.

On June 27, 2011, the Defendant opened the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education and the current account and issued a check of shares.

[2012 Highest 591] On December 1, 2011, the Defendant issued a check number E, face value 10,000,000, and a check number E, face value 10,000,000 at the office of (ju) D office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Songpa-gu, Seoul; and on February 1, 2012, the date of issuance, one sheet of the unit number in the name of the Defendant, the bank

On February 1, 2012, the holder of the above check-up check-up check-up was presented to the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Korea for payment of the check-up price.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

[2012 Godan924] On December 15, 2011, the Defendant issued a check number F, par value 3,110,000, and a check number f, par value 3,10,000 at the (ju) D office of the Defendant in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and a check number f, par value 3,10,000 on April 10, 2012 under the name of the said bank.

On April 10, 2012, the holder of the above check-up check-up was presented to the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Korea for payment of the check-up price.

However, from around that time to early 2012, the Defendant issued a total of 5 copies and a total of 43,110,321 won, as shown in the [Attachment Table 7] Nos. 1, 3, 5, 8, and 9, including that the Defendant did not receive as a disposition of suspension of transaction, and did not receive as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of each accusation book and each statement of shares;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports and copies of judgments;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act and the selection of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 39 (1) of the same Act for concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is against the defendant.

arrow