A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 21, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) received a report from a post office located in Pyeongtaek-si dong, that “a person under the influence of alcohol faced with head in a public telephone box and was used in the delivery,” and was called to the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station B police box affiliated with the police box, and was called to the Pyeongtaek-si B police box by C.

After that, at around 22:45 of the same day, the Defendant expressed to C the police officer who recommended him to invalid within the police box on the same day, that “this bit of bitbit of bit of a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

Therefore, as the police officer D and E recommended the Defendant to take the Defendant out of the police box, they interfere with legitimate performance of public duties on the security of the police officer, i.e., C, D, E’s life, physical protection of the people, crime prevention, and the maintenance of security and security of the earth while she took the bath that “Neee is a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of C, E, and D;

1. Application of investigative reports (verification of insulting power to police officers)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order is a case where the defendant interfered with police officers by assault or intimidation without reasonable grounds, and the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case with the attitude of disregarding the exercise of legitimate public authority, and the defendant is punished by a fine due to the same kind of crime.