Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 3, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the support of drinking water sources at the source of driving on July 3, 2015. On November 17, 2015, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving).
On August 4, 2018, the Defendant driven around 23:03 and around 0.243% alcohol concentration in blood, and driven a car with approximately 30 meters in front of the member-gu, Ansan-si.
2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;
The Defendant operated a passenger car owned by the Defendant without mandatory insurance, at the date, time, place, and place specified in paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Notice of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and a record of measuring drinking alcohol;
1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (Attachment to the same type of force);
1. Criminal facts under Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (driving of Drinking) concerning the relevant Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 (Determination of Imprisonment with labor for each case);
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of protection and observation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62-2, supra, on the grounds that the Defendant had a previous conviction of the same kind of drinking alcohol driving, a fine of 2016, and a fine of 2016, in consideration of alcohol concentration