Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is to correct some errors in the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except to re-use or add some parts of the judgment as follows. Thus, this is to be cited by the main sentence of Article 420
2. The cumulative profits and losses 59,000 in the sequence 2 of the 16th ruling of the court of first instance shall be applied to the amendment of errors by 590,000.
The term "D" in the 20th sentence of the first instance court shall be read as "C", and the term "Ma" in the 25th sentence shall be read as "D".
The third chapter of the judgment of the first instance court may recognize that there is an opinion that "it is deemed that there is an opinion that it has been formed" shall be taken into consideration.
The fourth line of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "Abandoned Vehicle" in the fourth line of the judgment of the first instance.
3. Re-paid part of the first instance judgment: “400 won per share of 15,950 won less the closing price of KRW 15,550 per share of 15,950 prior to the short sale time of the first instance judgment. Since shares of 1,979,08 and 1,000 won sold for 15,50 won per share of 1,979,000 won and 1,979,000 won per class and 15,000 won per class (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2,979,080 】 400 won per share of 2,979,080 won per class (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200, Jun. 1, 2016) are again included in the lower court’s holding of shares as follows: