Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for six months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A, on July 31, 2014, is serving as the Supreme Court after being sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on January 15, 2015, respectively, and appeal and appeal from each of the above judgments are pending in the Supreme Court.

Defendant

B On January 15, 2015, on June 15, 2015, after being sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor for special larceny, etc., the judgment became final and conclusive on January 23, 2015.

The Defendants and D, “2015 Man-Ma587, 2015, 587,” and “D, as they have come out of society and failed to meet living expenses, they capture another person’s mobile phone with theft.

At around 20:00 on May 28, 2014, the Defendants discovered the Victim F in front of the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-ro, and Defendant A asked the Victim to lend his mobile phone and received it from the Victim D, and then, Defendant A and B sent the Victim’s speech to the Victim and made the Victim’s attention only, and Defendant A and B escaped through the said mobile phone.

As a result, the Defendants stolen Samsung Tallon 1 mobile phone at a price equivalent to 800,000 won which is the market value owned by the victim together with D.

Defendant A, in collaboration with G and D on June 11, 2014, at the 107:43, Defendant A used the cresh in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on June 11, 2014, and used the cresh in which the victimJ is divingd, Defendant A and G were seated in each inner string, her starting line, her network, and her network. D used one cellular phone judy on the market price in which the victim was the victim’s ownership during the charging.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 587"

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. The investigation report (the confirmation of CCTV for the purpose of crime prevention, the confirmation of cell phones, and the specific details of the suspect) 2015 Godan1075;

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Investigative reports (Attachment of a copy of the Statement): Each inquiry report and each inquiry report;