Text
1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a party’s position 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s forest 4,958 square meters in Jinju-si (hereinafter “instant forest”).
(2) Defendant B is the mother of Defendant C, who was living together with the Plaintiff from September 2006 to January 201, 201.
B. Around June 2004, the Plaintiff received the donation of the forest of this case from F, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the forest of this case as was received on July 9, 2004 by Jinwon District Court, Jinwon District Court, Jinwon District Court, on which the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the forest of this case. 2) The Plaintiff donated 1/2 shares out of the forest of this case (hereinafter “share in this case”) to Defendant C, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on February 12, 2009 with Jinwon District Court, Jinju Branch Branch, 501, which was received on February 13, 2009 as to the share in this case.
3) Defendant C completed, on March 2, 2016, registration of the entire share transfer based on the gift on February 29, 2016, from the Changwon District Court Jinwon Branch Branch, Jinwon District Court Branch, 14939, which was received on March 2, 2016, to Defendant C with respect to the share in the instant dispute. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence No. 1-2, 2, 2, 18-1, 2, and 19-1, 2, and 19-1, 2, and
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. For the reasons delineated below by the Plaintiff, Defendant C is obligated to cancel the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Defendant C with respect to the instant dispute, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of Defendant B, which was made for the purpose of evading the duty to return the instant dispute after the cancellation of the instant contract, shall also be cancelled without any substantive reason.
1) On February 12, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant B to donate the pertinent dispute part to Defendant C, which was designated by Defendant B (hereinafter “instant contract”).
When concluding the contract, Defendant B performed the Plaintiff during the Plaintiff’s female life.