beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 150,000 won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 22, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) around 16:50, the “motor vehicle driver’s license” stated in the indictment for a driver’s license is a clerical error in writing at a section of about 2 km from the street in front of the lake Park in Yang Chang-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chang-gu, Chang-gu, Seo-si to the front front of the door in C et al., Seo-gu, Cheongju-si.
2. On June 22, 2015, around C factory entrance located in the Cheongju-si Office B, the Defendant: (a) received a report from D on the fact that “the principal offender has an interview at the factory, while opening an interview at the factory”; and (b) sought to return home from the police officer and patrol officer in the Cheongju-si Police Station E zone belonging to the Cheongju-si Police Station E zone; and (c) committed assault against G, on his own, on one occasion, both parts of the two mouths of G.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials.
3. From June 22, 2015 to June 17:18, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim D’s factory entry management work by force by driving the disturbance, i.e., passing the door of the access road, etc. from the inside of the blocking machine of the factory entrance, and passing the noise, “I see in the spirit of universality,” thereby obstructing the victim D’s factory entry management work.
4. Around 18:00 on June 22, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluoring to take a noise level), as stated in paragraphs (2) and (3) of the same Article, was arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties or obstruction of business and transferred to the E-district office of the police assigned for special guard, and was required to comply with the alcohol level four times from H to 19:08, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven a brea while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling at the Defendant’s entrance and smelling on the face of the brea face, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant did not comply with the blood alcohol measurement at all while deeming “undriving.”