1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant each of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) as to KRW 50,000,000 and its amount on February 2, 2012.

1. The facts below are based on each of the following facts: (a) the plaintiff, the plaintiff, the plaintiff, and the defendant did not dispute with each other; (b) Gap's evidence 1 to 6; (c) Gap's evidence 1 to 13; (d) Gap's evidence 1 to 16; and (e) Gap's evidence 18-1, 2; (e) Eul's evidence 18-2; and (e) Eul's testimony 3 to 6; (e) witness E,F; and witness H and I's testimony.

The lessor’s filing of a lawsuit to deliver a building to the previous lessee; 1) The 481.4 square meters of each floor of J building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter “the instant building”) shall be limited to “the instant building” from the following:

(1) Nonparty 1, Inc., Ltd. (hereinafter “Skbucks”).

(2) On November 21, 2011, the registration of co-ownership of Nonparty F (65/100 shares) and G (35/100 shares) under the name of Nonparty F (65/100 shares) was made on November 13, 201 with respect to the entire building of J building, including the instant building, for a five-year period of lease, filed a lawsuit against the Lone Starbucks Co., Ltd on December 23, 201 (hereinafter referred to as “leases”) seeking delivery of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “building delivery lawsuit”).

B. During the continuation of a building delivery lawsuit, the new lease contract is attempted 1) the status of the Defendants (Counterclaim Plaintiff), Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”).

A) The purpose of the real estate brokerage is a corporation established for the purpose of real estate brokerage, etc., Defendant D is the representative director of the Defendant corporation, and Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) C (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

) The employee of the Defendant Corporation is an employee of the Defendant Corporation (if all Defendant Corporation, Defendant D, and C are incorporated, then referred to as “the Defendant”).

(2) At the time of Defendant C’s having a pro rata relationship with Defendant C’s attempt of the lease brokerage, the representative director H used the position of “B director” at the time of Nonparty C (hereinafter “B director”) to introduce a new lessee of the instant building. Defendant C is a corporation L (hereinafter “L company”).